When planning their classes, teachers should not think about whether they want to switch their classes to a pure digital format or not. Instead, they should ask themselves if digital elements make sense from a didactic point of view. Having the necessary tools alone does not justify the use of e-learning formats. Instead, a well-balanced mix of synchronous and asynchronous elements makes the difference! Teachers have to decide from a didactic point of view to what extent they want to include e-learning in synchronous and asynchronous classes.
Synchronous classes run in real time with students and instructors attending together in a fixed period of time. Asynchronous classes run independently of time and location with students accessing class materials at different times, i.e. there is no personal interaction between students and instructors.
Both types of classes can be organized digitally or in an analog setting. A combination of synchronous and asynchronous teaching gives you more flexibility and enables you to specifically address learning deficits. In addition, it offers students the possibility to study in a self-paced manner and helps them developing key competencies, such as self-organization, time management, and media competencies.
Formative e-assessments, i.e. ungraded tests, are an effective tool to consolidate learning content. By including playful features, such as "jokers" or highscore boards, instructors can boost motivation.
As both students and instructors receive an overview of the learning progress, you can adapt your teaching strategy to the specific needs of your students.
Asynchronous teaching does not mean that there is no personal communication between students and teaching staff. Far from it! Communication is even more important in asynchronous settings. ILIAS provides different communication channels (forum, chat, consultation hour) to stay in touch with your students.
Providing feedback is a key element in the learning progress. But feedback is not just about telling students what they are doing wrong. Instead, it should provide meaningful information, solutions and tips how to improve the learning strategy.
Numerous tools in ILIAS help instructors to provide feedback automatically or on an individual basis (e.g. test, exercise, learning module). Peer feedback – i.e. mutual assessment among students – can also be implemented in ILIAS.
Due to its practice-oriented degree programs, Hochschule Geisenheim University attaches great importance to the overall goal of shifting the focus in university teaching towards skill-promoting trainings that challenge students to acquire new competencies. In addition to subject-related and methodological skills, we increasingly focus on interdisciplinary key competencies, such as analytical skills, self-management, and media literacy. This focus on skills and competencies has triggered the "shift from teaching to learning“ (Biggs/Tang 2007) and places students at the center of teaching/learning concepts. In order to implement the skill-based teaching approach, the eLearning Team focuses on three pillars: constructive alignment, feedback and formative assessments.
Unfortunately, teaching and studying can be two very different things because lecturers usually design their courses based on the content to be taught, while students focus on the exam result.
However, there is an easy solution - at least at first glance: constructive alignment.
Teaching and studying are all about interaction - no matter if you have a digital format or a traditional face-to-face class. Feedback is a key success factor for all teaching formats. In an online test, for instance, a "right" or "wrong" window that pops up after you have answered a question is the easiest kind of feedback. However, it does not promote the learning progress sustainably.
At the end of a course, there is usually a final exam that determines the student's grade. Extrinsically motivated students in particular tend to start revising their notes at the last minute and focus exclusively on the material relevant to the exam. However, this type of exam revision does not lead to a long-term study effect, as the course material is not repeated properly and will be forgotten shortly after the exam. One way to avoid this short-term study effect is to carry out formative assessments.